Diana Taylor’s article discusses
the performance, Two Undiscovered
Amerindians Visit, by Cuco Fusco and Guillermo Gómez-Peña.
In this traveling performance, the two artists confined themselves in a cage where
viewers could observe and explore them. The artists chose specific places for
their performances, countries that have histories of abuse towards natives
(page 163). This performance “repeated the colonialist gesture of producing the
‘savage’ body, and it historicized the practice by highlighting its citational
character (page 164.” What I found interesting in Taylor’s discussion of this
performance was her exploration of the histories of confining the “other.” For
example, the way in which museums present a discrepancy in power and how they
come to represent “the theatricality of colonialism (page 167).” When Taylor uses the word “theatricality” does
she mean colonialism is a spectacle in this context? Taylor also claims that “the
cage confronted the viewer with the unnatural and violent history of representation
and exhibition of non-Western human beings (page 167).” The cage also brings
into discussion the history of caging rebellious people in Latin America and
pre-Hispanic times. The cage in this performance opens the artists up to being
labeled and classified, while they remain silent, removing any individuality, similar
to the effects of colonialism and even imprisonment (page 167). In what ways
can we see the artists owning any sense of agency in this performance?
No comments:
Post a Comment