Chapter seven
covers a variety of performance arts through a long time span, most of which
create a commissure representing rejection to the contemporary arts of their time.
This junction, rather rejection or protest in some cases, joined the artist physical
body and expression to their personal agendas, which brings me to question that
some may have been simply seeking fame and fortune. I am not disregarding some
as true forms of art, nevertheless, “The punk aesthetic” (p. 181) may fit this emphasized
junction.
On page 151
Goldberg states ‘body art’ as a lose term that could represent a variety of
performance types, one of which being “their own persons as art material” (p.
153). This type brings to mind Carolee Schneemann’s work, along with being
relative to the attire introduced by the music bands of “The Sex Pistols or The
Clash” (p. 182). Although with the Punk aesthetics in regard to attire of
expressions, ‘living sculpture’ can be applied as well.
As performing art
has provided an excellent form to express political, cultural, gender or race discrimination,
and/or any inequalities, the Punk aesthetics of music performance rejected political
and social structure of their society in England, most likely due to the high
unemployment of the youth during the 1970’s. This “disruptive and cynical” aesthetic
art form did effect the “work of many performers” such as, “Cortez” and his
attire, or Winters ending his performance “with a mock-suicide”, all of which
may have been more to attract a larger crowd for personal notability and economics
rather than cultural rejections or protest. Nevertheless, these types of performances
reminded me of early Futurism or even Dada, which Goldberg outlines that “it
came close to some Futurist performances, in that it rejected establishment values
and ideas”. (p. 182)
As an additional point
of interest relating to performance art, or ‘living sculpture’, while visiting
London in 1978, I observed a large number of youths on the streets that adopted
the attire of the Punk aesthetics, wearing “safety pins” in their skin, “razor
blades” hanging off their clothes and ears, facial “tattoos” and “torn” clothes,
along with spiked hair. Although it may have reached the United States by that
time, I had never seen it, and the authorities warned us to stay clear of them
because it was a protest against the establishment. I remember thinking it was
just a performance, much like a ‘living sculpture’, and though very dangerous
to approach, that’s just what it was.
No comments:
Post a Comment